So, this has been my first semester back at college. I've been an engineer, a teacher, and a lifelong learner. I had success as a math teacher, I believed, primarily because I loved being in the classroom and my students knew that. They knew I loved my work and that I loved them. What I have learned through this course is that my success was actually in large part due to using strategies that are proven effective because of how the brain operates! I've always tried to stay up to date on what works with students, but now understanding WHY these strategies work I am so thankful for the insight. Going forward I will be more explicit with my students. Yes, taking breaks during lessons works, but now I can explain WHY (frontal lobe fatigue and time for the brain to wire!). Exercise and movement helps learning (oxygen flow is increased and movement is a pathway for learning!). Discussing strategies is metacognitive work, and isn't metacog...
One thing both Zull and Zadina talk about are how much the brain "loves a pattern"! From birth, the brain is constantly scanning for patterns, and it prefers complete patterns. This helps us in math class because math is ALL ABOUT PATTERNS! Zull states "If we expose students to incomplete images, charts, or graphs where progressions are not finished, students become motivated to work on them." (p132) Does your brain automatically try to place the puzzle piece where it belongs in the picture below? Incomplete patterns are something that I have seen motivate students time and time again. Math guru and blogger Dan Meyer ( http://blog.mrmeyer.com/ ) advocates to use that motivation by providing problems without all necessary information. As he puts it - "be less helpful". By providing only the framework (image or context) and the question, students are forced to think deeply about the problem and what information they need in order to solve ...